The Immoral Gene?

Mike at Christian Cognition with another interesting article.

Excerpt:

If macro-Evolution / natural selection / Darwinism are true – that species are selected to survive based on their survivable traits – is it possible for gay species to fit into the reproductive model? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to conclude that same-sex, sexually-reproductive species cannot reproduce their own kind when uniting together. If there is a gay gene that has evolved over time, wouldn’t those same gay genes actually die? (Therefore, it seems that the gay gene – if there was one – would die after the first generation.) After all, they cannot survive via reproduction. Instead, it seems they would adapt and evolve into heterosexual genes.

And how can it be moral (according to Darwinists) for same-sex, sexually-reproductive species to lay with the same sex of that same species? If Darwinism means that unfit species with doomed traits would eventually die, then why would it be moral for that species to lie with the same sex of that same species when doing so would lead to its own death? Instead, it should absolutely not lie with the same sex of that species. Therefore, shouldn’t the Darwinist strongly oppose homosexuality since the species cannot survive via reproduction (without the assistance of the opposite sex)?